Catatan

VGG vs ResNet vs Inception vs MobileNet¶

1. Use Cases:
   • VGG: Learning CNN basics, initial experiments, simple tasks.
   • ResNet: Complex tasks, image recognition, object detection, segmentation.
   • Inception: Image recognition, tasks needing multi-scale feature extraction.
   • MobileNet: Mobile and embedded applications, real-time processing.

2. Transfer Learning Performance:

   • VGG: Can provide good performance with proper fine-tuning but may struggle on very complex tasks.
   • ResNet: Strong performance for various tasks, even with minimal fine-tuning.
   • Inception: Good results on tasks requiring detailed feature extraction.
   • MobileNet: Efficient and suitable for transfer learning in resource-constrained scenarios.

3. Model Size and Parameters:

   • VGG: Larger number of parameters due to uniform architecture.
   • ResNet: Moderately large due to skip connections but manageable.
   • Inception: Medium-sized due to parallel filters but still reasonable.
   • MobileNet: Smaller in size and parameters, designed for efficiency.

4. Training Speed:

   • VGG: Slower training due to its depth and number of parameters.
   • ResNet: Slower compared to some lightweight architectures but reasonable for its depth.
   • Inception: Training can be slower due to parallel filters but provides good results.
   • MobileNet: Faster training, designed to be efficient.

5. Inference Speed:

   • VGG: Slower inference due to its large size.
   • ResNet: Moderately fast inference for its depth.
   • Inception: Inference can be slower due to its parallel architecture.
   • MobileNet: Faster inference, designed for real-time applications.

6. Depth and Performance:

   • VGG: Shallower compared to others, may not perform as well on very complex tasks.
   • ResNet: Deeper models, better suited for complex tasks and can handle vanishing gradient issues.
   • Inception: Moderate depth, good for object recognition and localization tasks.
   • MobileNet: Moderately deep, designed for mobile and embedded applications while maintaining reasonable performance.

7. Architecture Complexity:

   • VGG: Simple and uniform architecture with repeating convolutional and pooling layers.
   • ResNet: Utilizes skip connections to enable very deep architectures with reduced vanishing gradient issues.
   • Inception: Employs parallel convolutional filters of different sizes to capture multi-scale features.
   • MobileNet: Designed for efficiency with depthwise separable convolutions and fewer parameters.

8. Resource Considerations:

   • VGG: Requires more memory and processing power.
   • ResNet: More resource-intensive due to depth but well-suited for powerful hardware.
   • Inception: Requires significant resources due to parallel operations.
   • MobileNet: Designed for efficiency and resource-constrained environments.